Nov 07, 2023
Version 2
Waveform characteristics in thoracic paravertebral space: a prospective observational study V.2
- Amorn Vijitpavan 1,
- Sivaporn Termpornlert1,
- Pattika Subsoontorn1,
- Lalinthip Vareesunthorn1
- 1Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
Protocol Citation: Amorn Vijitpavan , Sivaporn Termpornlert, Pattika Subsoontorn, Lalinthip Vareesunthorn 2023. Waveform characteristics in thoracic paravertebral space: a prospective observational study. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.14egn3mxpl5d/v2Version created by Amorn Vijitpavan
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: November 07, 2023
Last Modified: November 07, 2023
Protocol Integer ID: 90597
Keywords: Thoracic paravertebral block, Respiratory waveform, Pressure value, Thoracic paravertebral space, Observational study, Ultrasound-guided, thoracic paravertebral space, appearance of the respiratory waveform, respiratory waveform, thoracic surgery, previous thoracic surgery, use of thoracic, anesthetized patient, typical regular respiratory waveform, nontypical respiratory waveform, paravertebral block, paravertebral space, pressure transducer system, pressure value within the tpv, elective lung surgery, tpvs waveform characteristic, plane ultrasound guidance, conduction of anesthesia, anesthesia, thoracic, paraspinal muscle, pressure value, waveform characteristic, monitoring of the pressure value, controlled ventilation, pain score, combined ultrasound, mean pressure, superior costotransverse ligament, extent of dermatomal blockade
Abstract
Background: With increased use of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB) in thoracic surgery, many faced the challenge of locating the thoracic paravertebral space (TPVS) ultrasonographically. This observational study aimed
to investigate the waveform characteristics and pressure value within the TPVS in Anesthetized patients with controlled ventilation.
Methods: Fifty patients scheduled for elective lung surgery were enrolled. After conduction of Anesthesia, all patients underwent TPVB at T4/5 and T6/7 using transverse, in-plane ultrasound guidance. A pressure transducer system with a desktop monitor was connected to the needle hub to measure pressure values and waveform characteristics in three locations: the paraspinal muscles, immediately behind the superior costotransverse ligament, and within the TPVS. Next, 15 mL of 0.33% bupivacaine was injected into each desired TPVS. After completion of the surgery, the extent of dermatomal blockade and the pain score was assessed in all patients.
Results: Ninety-eight typical regular respiratory waveforms with a mean pressure of ≤ 25 mmHg were detected in the TPVS of fifty patients. The sensitivity of the combined ultrasound and pressure waveform measurement
technique to identify the TPVS was 95.45% (95% confidence interval, 84.527–99.445) . Nontypical respiratory waveforms were present in two patients. Factors interfering with the TPVS waveform characteristics were previous thoracic surgery and chronic pleural inflammation.
Conclusion: Monitoring of the pressure value and waveform characteristics is a simple and reliable strategy to identify the needle tip in the TPVS. The appearance of the respiratory waveform ensures that the end of the needle aperture is within the TPVS.
Protocol for the study: Waveform characteristics in thoracic paravertebral space: a prospective observational study
Fifty patients scheduled for elective lung surgery (open thoracotomy and video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery) were recruited during 9th February 2021 to 17thMay 2021.
Anesthesiology residents or fellows at Ramathibodi Hospital obtained
preoperative information and provided informed consent. The inclusion criteria
were an age of 18 to 80 years and an American Society of Anesthesiologists
(ASA) physical status of I to III. The exclusion criteria were no provision of
informed consent, refusal to receive TPVB, a body mass index of > 35 kg/m2,
significant thoracic kyphoscoliosis, coagulopathy (platelet count of
<100,000 per mL or international normalized ratio of >1.4), allergies or
contraindications to medications used in the study protocol, and refusal to
participate or withdrawal of consent at any stage of the study.
All enrolled patients were fasted for at least 8 hours before surgery. Standard ASA monitoring was
performed throughout the surgery. Anesthesia was induced using propofol
(2.0–2.5 mg/kg), fentanyl (1–2 mcg/kg), and cisatracurium (0.15–0.2 mg/kg) intravenously.
First, the tip of the needle was identified in the paraspinal muscles. Second, the needle tip was
advanced immediately posterior to the superior costotransverse ligament (SCTL)
and confirmed by a 1.0-mL normal saline injection. Third, the needle tip was located
in the TPVS and confirmed by a 0.5- to 3.0-mL saline injection, which widened
the TPVS and caused anterior displacement of the pleura.
The operator identified the first rib and then counted downward until the fourth rib was
reached. The probe was then moved inward to locate the fourth transverse
process. The ultrasound probe was then dragged downward to locate the fifth
transverse process and identify the location of the TPVS between T4 and T5, labelling
the site with an indelible pen. The ultrasound probe was moved further downward
to locate the sixth and seventh transverse processes and the TPVS was marked
between T6 and T7.
An echogenic needle (SonoTAP; Pajunk GmbH Medizintechnologie, Geisingen, Germany) was connected to a pressure transducer system (TruWave PX260; Edwards Lifesciences, Irvine, CA, USA) via a three-way stopcock (Discofix 3SC; B. Braun, Melsungen, Germany) and a 36-inch
noncompliant pressure tubing (Edwards Lifesciences). The pressure transducer
was connected to a desktop monitor (IntelliVue MP70; Philips, Amsterdam,
Netherlands) and levelled at the spinous process. The needle was then inserted
at the skin approximately 3 cm from the midline and advanced laterally to
medially under in-plane ultrasound visualization. The pressure values and
characteristics of the thoracic paravertebral waveform were recorded along the
needle trajectory in three steps.
The operator then slowly injected 15 mL 0.33% bupivacaine into each desired TPVS. The collected
waveforms were classified into three patterns (A, B, and C) according to our
pilot study and based on previous trials. The “A” waveform was defined as a
smooth and regular sine wave resembling the respiratory pattern with a mean
value of ≤ 25 mmHg; the “B” waveform was defined as an irregular coarse, wavy
line with a mean value of ≤ 40 mmHg; and the “C” waveform was defined as a
tense, straight line with a mean value of > 40 mmHg.