Screening of compounds for inhibition of Sporothrix spp. growth
1. Stock solutions of compounds in dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) at 1 mM were diluted in RPMI 1640 medium1 supplemented with 2% glucose and buffered to pH 7.2, with 0.165 M MOPS (from here on referred to as “supplemented RPMI”) to obtain concentrations of 2 µM using sterile microtubes;
2. Aliquots of 100 µl of each compound were added in four wells of a flat-bottom 96-well microplate (KASVI, Brazil);
3. A standardized suspension of Sporothrix yeasts was adjusted using a Neubauer chamber, prepared in supplemented RPMI, and 100 µl containing 2 x 105 CFU/ml was added in microplates containing compounds;
4. The final concentration of compounds was 1 µM, while the final concentration of cells was 1 x 105 CFU/ml;
5. The following controls were included in the experiment: (i) antifungal control containing 1 µM itraconazole1, (ii) diluent control containing 0.1% DMSO in supplemented RPMI, (iii) negative control containing only supplemented RPMI, and (iv) positive control with Sporothrix cells growing in supplemented RPMI without compounds (all in quadruplicate);
6. Samples were incubated for 48 h, at 35 ºC, in a 5% CO2 atmosphere;
7. Fungal growth was analyzed by visual inspection in an inverted light microscope (Axiovert 100, ZEISS Company, Germany);
8. After visual inspection, samples were homogenized and the optical density was quantified by spectrophotometric readings at 492 nm, in a microtiter plate reader (EMax Plus, Molecular Devices, USA);
9. The absorbance value for each well was subtracted from the mean value for the negative control;
10. Inhibition of fungal growth (I) relative to positive controls was calculated according to the following equation: I = 100 – (A x 100/C), where A is the absorbance of treated wells, and C is the absorbance of positive controls;
11. Inhibitions of more than 80% were defined as the cutoff, corresponding to clearly visible preventions of growth when samples were analyzed by visual inspection.
1Sigma Chemical Co., USA.