Sep 02, 2021
- Jonathan Houseley,
- Cristina Cruz
- Springer Nature Books
External link: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-9822-7_5
Protocol Citation: Jonathan Houseley, Cristina Cruz 2021. Removing Residual Background. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bntameie
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: October 22, 2020
Last Modified: September 02, 2021
Protocol Integer ID: 43586
Keywords: lncRNA, ncRNA, northern blot, hybridization, probes, noncoding rna, agarose gels of glyoxylated rna, analysis of high molecular weight rna, glyoxylated rna, rna on agarose gel, molecular weight determination of rna, using rna probe, rna on polyacrylamide, resolution separation of small rna fragment, separated rna, rna probe, processing of ncrna, rna research, high molecular weight rna, stranded rna, detailed insights into complex rna population, explosion in rna research, rna processing analysis, rna processing, unsurpassed insights into ncrna distribution, studying rna processing, effective rna denaturant, rna, specialist rna research group, rna isoform, complex rna population, methods for routine mrna quantification, small rna fragment, source of rna, sequencing gel electrophoresi, rna species, routine mrna quantification, rna form, radioactive probing of rna membrane, rna membrane, standard protein gel electrophoresis system, rna processing by complex, sequencing gel, ncrna distribution, gel electrophoresi, n,
Abstract
Over the past decade a plethora of noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) have been identified, initiating an explosion in RNA research. Although RNA sequencing methods provide unsurpassed insights into ncRNA distribution and expression, detailed information on structure and processing are harder to extract from sequence data. In contrast, northern blotting methods provide uniquely detailed insights into complex RNA populations but are rarely employed outside specialist RNA research groups. Such techniques are generally considered difficult for nonspecialists, which is unfortunate as substantial technical advances in the past few decades have solved the major challenges. Here we present simple, reproducible and highly robust protocols for separating glyoxylated RNA on agarose gels and heat denatured RNA on polyacrylamide–urea gels using standard laboratory electrophoresis equipment. We also provide reliable transfer and hybridization protocols that do not require optimization for most applications. Together, these should allow any molecular biology lab to elucidate the structure and processing of ncRNAs of interest.
Introduction
Northern blotting methods allow for simultaneous quantification and molecular weight determination of RNA. Although superseded by qPCR and sequencing methods for routine mRNA quantification, northern blotting is the method of choice when complex mixtures of overlapping species are under investigation. This is particularly true when studying RNA processing by complexes such as the exosome, and generally aids in resolving the behavior of differentially expressed RNA isoforms. Historically, northern analysis has been something of a black art; running a high-quality formaldehyde gel required substantial skill and a little luck, while radioactive probing of RNA membranes often resulted in terrible cross-hybridization and invisible signals. Fortunately, technology has moved on such that modern northern analysis methods are simple and robust.
Electrophoretic separation of single-stranded RNA is more complex than double-stranded DNA as RNA forms strong secondary structures that impede separation by molecular weight in a gel matrix. For analysis of high molecular weight RNA in agarose gels, chemical modification of guanine is the preferred method to melt secondary structure, which disrupts C:G base pairing and allows single stranded RNA to migrate according to size. Although formaldehyde has been widely used for this purpose [1], it is not ideal due to issues with sample migration and batch-to-batch variation. Furthermore formaldehyde gels release toxic formaldehyde gas; this did not overly concern early investigators eager to replace the hideously toxic denaturant methyl mercury used in the first northern blotting protocols [2,3], but is clearly a problem in modern labs. To circumvent these issues glyoxal was long ago suggested as an effective RNA denaturant [4], but originally required technically awkward buffer recirculation. This problem was solved by the introduction of BPTE running buffer, which allows agarose gels of glyoxylated RNA to be run with no more difficulty than a normal DNA agarose gel [5].
High-resolution separation of small RNA fragments (~20–250 bp) is best performed on denaturing acrylamide gels, which rely on heat and urea rather than chemical modification to prevent secondary structure formation. The technique is identical to traditional sequencing gel electrophoresis [6], however, the apparatus used for sequencing is not practical for northern blotting and standard protein gel electrophoresis systems are well-suited for this purpose. Helpfully, many of the complications inherent to running a high quality sequencing gel can be safely ignored unless base-pair resolution is required.
Separated RNA is transferred to a membrane by capillary transfer for agarose gels or using an electroblotting system for acrylamide gels [7,8,9]. Various different membranes and transfer conditions have been described but we find charged nylon membrane best for all standard applications [10], and observe little difference between transfer methods. Similarly, many combinations of probes and hybridization buffers can be used to detect RNA species, each having their own strengths and weaknesses. Here we provide a protocol for using RNA probes transcribed from PCR products; in our hands these are both the most reliable and the most sensitive, and as such are the probe of choice for new users [11,12,13,14]. We also provide probing conditions for use of synthetic oligonucleotides, which are widely used in RNA processing analysis since they provide unparalleled resolution of intermediates, and for random-primed DNA probes.
The source of RNA used for northern blotting is rarely critical as long as it is of high quality (see Note 1), and therefore in this chapter we focus purely on the gel systems and hybridization methods.
Guidelines
RNA Handling and RNase-Free Technique
The difficulties in handling RNA are often overemphasized. In our hands, most of the cumbersome procedures recommended for avoiding RNase contamination seem to be dispensable. We use tubes and water specifically designated for RNA work, but take few other precautions. Solutions for gels and blotting are made with milliQ water in normal lab bottles with standard chemicals weighed in disposable weighing boats. We do not DEPC treat water or solutions, or use RNase decontaminating sprays or wipes routinely. It is good to have RNase ZAP in the laboratory to clean occasional contaminations or to wipe for example tissue grinding tools that will be in direct contact with the sample. For the final resuspension of RNA samples, we use commercially available nuclease free water. On first use, electrophoresis tanks can be rendered RNase-free by treating with 3% H2O2for 10 min, then rinsed with milliQ water, then set aside for RNA work if required. Blotting and hybridization can be carried out in normal laboratory trays and glassware. We use certified RNase-free filter tips and set aside a specific set of pipettes for handling stocks of RNase and RNase-containing solutions like plasmid miniprep resuspension buffer. Our bodies are a good source of RNase contamination, so care should be taken to avoid touching the inside of the lids when handling tubes. After assembling reagents, solutions and equipment for northern blotting, it is advisable to run a test gel using RNA of known quality before handling precious samples; ribosomal RNA bands should be clearly resolved and the higher molecular weight band (28S in mammals, 25S in yeast) should be brighter than the lower band (18S). This will confirm that the reagents are sufficiently RNase free.
Conversely, nonenzymatic mechanisms of RNA degradation need to be considered: RNA hydrolysis is catalyzed by alkaline pH and/or divalent cations, particularly with increasing temperature. Therefore, store RNA in water as opposed to TE (pH 8) or similar and beware of reaction conditions involving divalent cations and heat. DNase treatment can be a problem as all DNase I buffers contain magnesium, and DNase treatment is rarely necessary for northern blots as high molecular weight genomic DNA usually resolves far from the bands of interest.
Materials
Removing Residual Background
1. 0.1× SSC with 0.1% SDS
Safety warnings
Please refer to the Safety Data Sheets (SDS) for health and environmental hazards.
IMPORTANT: Make sure you have appropriate training to work with radioactivity under the local rules and legislation for your institution, and perform all radioactive work in the designated area.
Before start
It is recommended to read through the guidelines before starting any work with RNA.
Removing Residual Background
1h
Wash at Room temperature in a plastic box on a rocker with copious 0.1× SSC 0.1% SDS for at least 01:00:00 .
Note
Sometimes membranes have a residual smeary background that interferes with the signal. This is more common with large membranes or when two membranes are probed in one bottle.
If this wash fails, use a paper towel to scrub the membrane on both sides while it is under the SSC/SDS—repeat until no more counts come off onto the paper towel. This will not damage the RNA or the probe and removes residual radioactive gunk that precipitates out of the hybridization buffer.
1h