Jun 22, 2020
Meta-analysis of scope harvesting radial artery
- 1Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung
External link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0236499
Protocol Citation: Tzu-yen Huang 2020. Meta-analysis of scope harvesting radial artery. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bhrdj526
Manuscript citation:
Huang T, Huang T, Cheng Y, Wang Y, Chen T, Yin S, Yeh C (2020) Radial artery harvesting in coronary artery bypass grafting surgery—Endoscopic or open method? A meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 15(7): e0236499. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236499
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: June 21, 2020
Last Modified: June 22, 2020
Protocol Integer ID: 38405
Check MeSH terms, set reaserch keywords: radial artery and harvest.
5d
Searches in Pubmed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE, to find studies published from January 1974 to July 2019.
1m
Articles with comparisons of open and endoscope artery harvesting were included as long as there were adult patients with coronary artery disease undergoing CABG.
Systemic-reviews, case series and case reports were excluded. Studies comparing open arery hatvesting and minimal invasive radial artery harvesting were also excluded. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized observational articles including prospective or retrospective studies were included.
3m
Primary outcomes included the wound infection rate, the wound complication rate, harvesting site neurological complications of the forearm during hospitalization, in-hospital mortality, long-term survival (over one year), and the patency rate (duration may be defined differently by research, from in-hospital to 3–5 years).
1m
The risk of bias of randomized controlled trials was evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool—Revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2).
The methodological quality of non-randomized controlled trials (NRCTs) was assessed by the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale (NOS) .
1m
Data synthesis and statistical analysis were conducted using Review Manager
1m
Complete study.
1m