Sep 08, 2025

Public workspaceLibrary Preparation for Illumina Sequencing of Microsatellite Loci

  • Katja Reichel1,
  • Luisa Drautz1,
  • Ralitsa Moynova1,
  • Sabine Scheel1,
  • Sarah Sparmann2,3,
  • Susan Mbedi2,4
  • 1Freie Universität Berlin;
  • 2Berlin Center for Genomics in Biodiversity Research (BeGenDiv);
  • 3Leibniz Institute of Freshwater Ecology and Inland Fisheries (IGB);
  • 4Museum für Naturkunde Berlin – Leibniz Institute for Evolution and Biodiversity Research
Icon indicating open access to content
QR code linking to this content
Protocol CitationKatja Reichel, Luisa Drautz, Ralitsa Moynova, Sabine Scheel, Sarah Sparmann, Susan Mbedi 2025. Library Preparation for Illumina Sequencing of Microsatellite Loci. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.yxmvmej55g3p/v1
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License,  which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: September 11, 2024
Last Modified: September 08, 2025
Protocol Integer ID: 107436
Keywords: SSRseq, MSseq, Microsatellites, Simple sequence repeats, Multiplex PCR, Illumina, Magnetic beads, multiple microsatellite loci, microsatellite loci through several decade, microsatellite loci, microsatellite length data, microsatellite length polymorphism, reproducible genetic markers for population, reproducible genetic marker, library preparation for illumina sequencing, uc davis genome center websites about size selection, illumina sequencing, metagenomic sequencing library preparation protocol, dna sample, uc davis genome center website, multiple pcrs for large number, genome, genetic study, specific primer, multiple pcr, specific combinatorial sequence tag, specific pcr reaction, several multiplex pcr, null allele, pcr, pcr product, primer
Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER – FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK

The protocol content here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, clinical, or safety advice, or otherwise; content added to protocols.io is not peer reviewed and may not have undergone a formal approval of any kind. Information presented in this protocol should not substitute for independent professional judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Any action you take or refrain from taking using or relying upon the information presented here is strictly at your own risk. You agree that neither the Company nor any of the authors, contributors, administrators, or anyone else associated with protocols.io, can be held responsible for your use of the information contained in or linked to this protocol or any of our Sites/Apps and Services.
Abstract
Through several decades, microsatellite length polymorphisms have been considered the most reliable and reproducible genetic markers for population genetic studies. As a PCR-based method using taxon-specific primers, microsatellite loci can be amplified even from low-concentration, degraded or contaminated DNA samples. However, known issues with the interpretation of microsatellite length data include band shifts, stuttering, length homoplasy, null alleles, paralogs or off-target amplicons and missing information on allele dosage in polyploids. Comparing the actual sequences at and around microsatellite loci, instead of just their length according to capillary electrophoresis, may alleviate some of these difficulties. Since multiple microsatellite loci are needed to achieve representativeness of the marker system across the genome, but multiple PCRs for large numbers of samples soon become too cost- and time-intensive, we combine multiple locus-specific PCR reactions in one or several multiplex PCRs. PCR products are subsequently prepared for Illumina sequencing, including the integration of sample-specific combinatorial sequence tags.

This protocol is based on the BeGenDiv Amplicon dual indexing protocol (general structure; in turn based on Illumina's 16S Metagenomic Sequencing Library Preparation protocol), Lepais et al. 2020 for multiplex SSR amplification, and Information from the Illumina and UC Davis Genome Center websites about size selection with magnetic beads.


Figure 1. Schematic overview of the process described and format of DNA products obtained with this protocol.

Image Attribution
K. Reichel, modified from L. Drautz.
Materials
Reagents
  • Locus-specific primers with partial Illumina tail (see below)
  • Sample-specific Illumina primers
  • gDNA of sufficient quality / quantity to serve as template
  • high-precision polymerase, e.g. Herculase (Agilent), and its buffer 
  • dNTPs
  • DMSO
  • magnetic beads, e.g. CleanNA beads (GC biotech)
  • Ultra-pure Water
  • TE buffer
  • Ethanol
 
Consumables
  • 96 well plates or PCR tubes
 
Equipment
  • Pipettes and tips
  • Thermocycler
  • Gel electrophoresis equipment & chemicals – see SOP on gel electrophoresis
  • Qubit & chemicals
  • Tape Station / Fragment analyser (automated gel electrophoresis) & chemicals
  • optionally: Plate reader (FLUOstar OPTIMA), qPCR
 
 
Locus-specific primer design
 
For this protocol to work, locus-specific primers have to be extended by Illumina overhangs on their 5’ ends (i.e. new primer sequence always starts with the Illumina overhang). These are:
 
F primer (5’>3’): TCGTCGGCAGCGTCAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG
R primer (5’>3’): GTCTCGTGGGCTCGGAGATGTGTATAAGAGACAG

Between the Illumina overhang and the locus-specific primer, 0-4 unspecific bases may be added during primer synthesis, to increase the diversity of the bases being read synchronously. However, for small numbers of samples and diverse target loci, this may be unnecessary.
Troubleshooting
Before start
If you have not previously used the primers / primer pools or polymerase you will work with, first test their compatibility on some samples for which you have a lot of material / gDNA. Testing primer pools in silico with software such as PrimerPooler (Brown et al. 2017) or MultiPLX (Kaplinski et al. 2005) has so far proved uninformative, but may serve as inspiration for suitable pools.
PCR 1 – Locus-specific (multiplex) PCR
For each sample and pool, plus a negative control containing no template, run a PCR with the following protocol:
Volume [µl]ReagentStock concentration
12.9dd H2O 
4.0Polymerase buffer5x
0.4dNTP mix25 mM each
0.3HiFi Polymerase (Herculase)5 U/µl
1.6Primer mix (F+R)10 pm/µl each
0.8Template DNA~ 10 ng/µl
20.0Total volume 
Programme95°C 2' 30'', [95°C 30'', Ta°C 30'', 72°C 30'']30, 72°C 2', 4°C ∞
Table 1: PCR 1A conditions.
The annealing temperature Ta should be set according to the properties of your primers.
If working on PCR plates, make sure to use the exact same order of samples on each plate, to ease pooling later on.
Check your PCR products on a 1-1.5% agarose gel (see Fig. 2).
Figure 2. Examples of PCR 1B results for one multiplex PCR reaction. Result after PCR 1A and negative controls for comparison.


If necessary, supplement the first PCR (PCR 1A, step 1) with a second round of PCR, adding only new (diluted) polymerase to the samples (PCR 1B):
Volume [µl]ReagentStock concentration
18.0Product of PCR 1A 
1.8dd H2O 
0.2HiFi Polymerase (Herculase)5 U/µl
20.0Total volume 
Programme95°C 2' 30'', [95°C 30'', Ta°C 30'', 72°C 30'']30, 72°C 2', 4°C ∞
Table 2: PCR 1B conditions.
All settings of the original PCR programme (step 1) are kept identical.
Check your PCR products on an agarose gel again (see step 2).
Equimolar locus pooling
For each sample and pool, determine the DNA concentration of the PCR product using fluorometric quantification (Qubit). When working with many samples, either use a plate reader or select samples which appear to have very high, very low and “typical” product concentrations according to the agarose gel (step 4).
Optionally check peculiar / “aberrant” PCR products against negative and positive (“typical”) controls in an automated electrophoresis system (Tape Station or Fragment Analyzer).
Calculate the amount of PCR products to transfer for each sample from each primer pool in PCR 1, so that the amount of DNA per pool (or, more correctly still, the product per primer pair in each pool) are the same.
Transfer the PCR product amounts calculated in step 7 into one new tube per sample / one well per sample on a new plate.
Bead clean-up 1
Freshly prepare at least 400 µl * no. of samples of 70% ethanol for washing.
Bring magnetic beads to room temperature and vortex thoroughly, then follow the size selection protocol (single-sided clean-up):
Add beads in a 0.8 : 1.0 (beads : PCR product) ratio to the pooled PCR products and mix by pipetting up & down several times.
ABCDEFGH
Sample [µl]10152025304050
Beads [µl]8121620243240
Total [µl]18273645547290
Table 3: Bead clean-up sample and bead volumes.
Incubate at room temperature for 5 min (without shaking).
Place tubes / plate on magnetic rack for 2-5 min; beads should aggregate in a pellet close to the magnet, solution should be clear.
While still on the magnetic rack, carefully remove and discard the supernatant without disturbing the bead pellet (have NO beads in the pipet!).
Add 200 µl of 70% Ethanol (from step 9) to each sample and incubate for 10 s.
Remove and discard supernatant.
Repeat the two previous steps.
Air dry the bead pellets (room temperature or incubate at 37°C) for approx. 10 min with opened lids (do not overdry the beads!).
Add the same amount of 1x TE buffer to each sample as corresponds to its original volume after step 8.
Remove samples from magnetic rack, vortex gently and incubate for 5 min at room temperature.
Place tubes / plate on magnetic rack for 2 min; beads should aggregate in a pellet close to the magnet.
Transfer the supernatant (about 90-95% of the original volume) for each sample into a new tube per sample / one well per sample on a new plate.
Optionally check the outcome (band removal, uniformity of sample concentration) on a gel and/or automated electrophoresis system. If necessary, adjust the bead volume ratios (more beads ≈ less removal).
PCR 2 – Sample-specific PCR
For each sample, plus a negative control containing no template, run a PCR with the following protocol, giving each sample a unique combination of P5/P7 primers:
Volume [µl]ReagentStock concentration
to totaldd H2O 
4.0Polymerase buffer5x
0.2dNTP mix25 mM each
0.2HiFi Polymerase (Herculase)5 U/µl
0.5Index-Primer P510 pm/µl
0.5Index-Primer P7 10 pm/µl
0.8DMSO 
2-10solution of PCR product~ 10 ng/µl
20.0Total volume 
Programme95°C 2', [95°C 20'', 52°C 30'', 72°C 30'']8, 72°C 3', 4°C ∞
Table 4: PCR 2 conditions.
The volume of the PCR product depends on the concentration after clean-up (step 11).
Bead clean-up 2
Perform clean-up (step 10).
Repeat the previous step, re-suspending the DNA in 17 µl 1x TE at step 10.9.
Library check and equimolar sample pooling
Check all PCR products, including the negative control and a subset of templates, on a gel (see step 2).
Compare template and cleaned product for a selection of samples on an automated electrophoresis system. There should be a clear length shift between template and products, although indexing doesn’t work perfectly and some un-indexed fragments will remain.
Depending on the uniformity of concentrations and indexing success as estimated through steps 15 and 16, choose one of three options:

concentrations / indexing ~ uniform: A – pool PCR products from all samples with the same volume

indexing ~ uniform: B – get fluorometric measurements from all samples (plate reader) and pool equimolarly based on these values

else: C – perform qPCR on all samples (BeGenDiv) and pool equimolarly based on these values

If available, a fourth alternative is to test-sequence the library and then re-pool the samples according to the sequencing output for each sample.
Hand over your pooled library to the sequencing facility.
Protocol references
Brown SS, Chen Y, Wang M, Clipson A, Ochoa E, Du M 2017:
Biology Methods and Protocols 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/biomethods/bpx006



Kaplinski L, Andreson R, Puurand T, Remm M 2005: MultiPLX: automatic grouping and evaluation of PCR primers. Bioinformatics 21(8). https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bti219

Lepais O, Chancerel E, Boury C, Salin F, Manicki A, Taillebois L, Dutech C, Aissi A, Bacles CFE, Daverat F, Launey S, Guichoux E. 2020. Fast sequence-based microsatellite genotyping development workflow. PeerJ 8:e9085. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.9085

Mbedi S & Sparmann S 2017: BeGenDiv Amplicon dual indexing protocol, version 2. Unpublished, available from the authors.

UC Davis Genome Center 2023: How do I size select libraries for the HiSeq 4000 with beads? Website [accessed 09/2024]. https://dnatech.genomecenter.ucdavis.edu/faqs/how-do-i-size-select-libraries-for-the-hiseq-4000-with-beads/