Inclusion and exclusion criteria
This review will adhere to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines (Tricco et al., 2018). To ensure methodological consistency and relevance to the research question, the following criteria will be applied:
Peer-reviewed articles: Only peer-reviewed publications will be included to maintain scientific quality and credibility.
Studies presenting primary data: Eligible studies must provide original data, either quantitative or qualitative, to directly inform the review question.
Focus on heatwaves and falls: Articles must explicitly examine heatwaves as an exposure and falls (or fall-related injuries) as an outcome.
English language: Studies published in English will be included, reflecting feasibility considerations given the review team’s language capacity.
No date restriction: All years of publication will be considered to capture the evolution of evidence over time.
Non-primary data sources: Reviews, editorials, opinion pieces, and commentaries will be excluded, as they do not provide original data for synthesis.
Grey literature: Reports, conference abstracts, and unpublished studies will be excluded to maintain a focus on peer-reviewed evidence with consistent reporting standards.
Case series and single case reports: These will be excluded due to limited generalisability and potential for bias.
Non-English publications: Excluded because translation resources are not available within the scope of this review.
P = The study population of interest
All population groups globally.
Unintentional falls requiring treatment from a health professional (e.g. ambulance, emergency department, hospitalisation, or General Practitioner) or leading to death
Search strategy and databases to be searched
A scoping review will be conducted to explore the relationship between heatwaves and fall-related health outcomes such as injuries, hospital admissions, emergency department presentations, and mortality. This review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework.
The objective is to map existing literature on the association between heatwaves and fall incidents across various populations and settings. Given the anticipated heterogeneity in study designs, populations, and outcome measures, a meta-analysis will not be feasible.
The literature search will be undertaken in the following databases:
Search terms will include combinations of synonyms and MeSH terms related to:
- Exposure: heatwaves, high temperatures, extreme heat
- Outcome: falls, injuries, trauma, accidents, emergency visits, hospital admissions, death/mortality
Boolean operators (AND, OR) will be used to structure the search strategies. The review will include peer-reviewed studies published in English with no restriction on publication year to ensure comprehensive coverage. All identified references will be exported into EndNote for de-duplication and screening. The screening process will involve two phases:
- Title and abstract review, followed by
- Full-text review based on pre-specified inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Eligible studies must report on the relationship between heatwaves and fall-related health outcomes. Editorials, opinion pieces, and conference abstracts will be excluded. Data extraction will follow a structured format capturing author, year, country, study design, sample size, population, heat exposure metric, outcome definition, and main findings.
Findings will be synthesized narratively and presented in tables categorizing study characteristics and reported associations.
After deduplication, the search results will be imported into the Rayyan online platform (https://www.rayyan.ai/) for eligibility screening. Title and abstract screening will be conducted independently and in a blinded manner by at least two reviewers. Studies that clearly do not meet the inclusion criteria will be excluded. Articles marked as “maybe” or identified as conflicts will progress to full-text assessment, along with those deemed potentially eligible at the initial stage. Full-text screening will also be performed by a minimum of two reviewers, with any disagreements resolved through discussion or adjudication by a third reviewer. A data extraction form will be developed in Microsoft Excel, drawing on guidance from the Cochrane Public Health Group (2011) and Joanna Briggs Institute (2011). For each included study, the following information will be recorded: country of study, year of publication, study objectives, design, setting, population characteristics, sampling and data collection methods, theoretical framework or hypotheses (if stated), definition of heatwave, fall-related outcomes, thematic area, key results and conclusions, as well as any reported policy or intervention recommendations. A section for reviewer comments will also be included to capture additional notes or observations.
Quality and risk of bias assessment
The methodological quality of included studies will be assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal tools, which provide structured checklists tailored to different study designs. Two reviewers will independently appraise each study using the appropriate JBI checklist, considering aspects such as the clarity of research aims, appropriateness of study design, adequacy of sampling methods, validity and reliability of measurement tools, completeness of data analysis, and transparency in reporting.
Each criterion score on the JBI checklist will be converted into percentage. Discrepancies between reviewers will be resolved through discussion, and a third reviewer will be consulted if consensus cannot be reached. The appraisal outcomes will not be used as an exclusion criterion; rather, they will inform the interpretation of the evidence base and highlight potential limitations in the included studies. A summary table of appraisal results will be provided to give an overview of study quality across the review.
The extracted data will be synthesised using a descriptive and thematic approach consistent with scoping review methodology (Arksey & O’Malley, 2005; Peters et al., 2020). Study characteristics (e.g., country, year of publication, design, population, heatwave definition, and fall-related outcomes) will be summarised in tabular form and presented using frequencies and proportions where appropriate. A narrative synthesis will describe the scope and nature of existing evidence, with emphasis on study settings, definitions applied, methodological approaches, and key findings. Thematic coding will be used to identify common pathways linking heatwaves and falls, such as physiological mechanisms (e.g., dehydration, dizziness, heat stress), behavioural adaptations, and health system responses. Identified gaps in the literature will be highlighted to inform future research priorities.
Funding and conflict of interest
No external funding is sought or will be received for this study. The authors declare no conflict of interest.