Nov 12, 2022
Comparison of measured LDL cholesterol with calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae in diabetic adults at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital/NHLS Laboratory
- Mogomotsi Dintshi1,
- Ngalulawa Kone1,
- Siyabonga Khoza1
- 1Departement of Chemical Pathology, National Health Laboratory Services and University of Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.
External link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0277981
Protocol Citation: Mogomotsi Dintshi, Ngalulawa Kone, Siyabonga Khoza 2022. Comparison of measured LDL cholesterol with calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae in diabetic adults at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital/NHLS Laboratory. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.yxmvm2ky6g3p/v1
Manuscript citation:
Dintshi M, Kone N, Khoza S (2022) Comparison of measured LDL cholesterol with calculated LDL-cholesterol using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae in diabetic adults at Charlotte Maxeke Johannesburg Academic Hospital/NHLS Laboratory. PLoS ONE 17(12): e0277981. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277981
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: October 10, 2022
Last Modified: November 12, 2022
Protocol Integer ID: 71084
Keywords: Calculated low density lipoprotein; Diabetes mellitus; Direct low density lipoprotein; Friedewald formula; Martin-Hopkins formula, comparison of measured ldl cholesterol, measured ldl cholesterol, national cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel iii, density lipoprotein cholesterol, hopkins formulae in diabetic adult, total cholesterol, measured ldl, friedewald formula at ldl, cholesterol, friedewald formula underestimate ldl, treatment target for cholesterol, hypertriglyceridemia patient, good linear relationship against measured ldl, triglyceride, calculated ldl, diabetic patient, hypertriglyceridemia, underestimate ldl, adult diabetes patient, guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention, diabetic adult, european society of cardiology, ldl, cardiovascular disease prevention, friedewald formula
Abstract
Background
National Cholesterol Education Programme Adult Treatment Panel III (NCEP ATP III) and the European Society of Cardiology recommends using low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) as a treatment target for cholesterol lowering therapy. The Friedewald formula underestimate LDL-C in non-fasted and hypertriglyceridemia patients. This study aimed to compare measured LDL-C to calculated LDL-C in diabetic patients using the Friedewald and Martin-Hopkins formulae.
Methods
The data of 1 247 adult diabetes patients were retrospectively evaluated, and included triglycerides (TG), LDL-C, total cholesterol, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol that were measured on the Roche Cobas® c702. Passing-Bablok regression analysis was used to determine the degree of agreement between measured LDL-C and calculated LDL-C using both formulae. The Bland-Altman plots were used to assess the bias at medical decision limits based on the 2021 European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice.
Results
Both formulae showed a good linear relationship against measured LDL-C. However, the Martin-Hopkins formula outperformed the Friedewald formula at LDL-C treatment target <1.4mmol/L. The Friedewald formula and the Martin-Hopkins formula had 14.9% and 10.9% mean positive bias, respectively. At TG-C ≥1.7 mmol/L, the Martin-Hopkins formula had a lower mean positive bias of 4.2 % (95 % CI 3.0-5.5) compared to the Friedewald formula, which had a mean positive bias of 21.8 % (95 % CI 19.9-23), which was higher than the NCEP ATP III recommended total allowable limit of 12%.
Conclusion
The Martin-Hopkins formula performed better than the Friedewald formula at LDL-C of 1.4 mmol/L and showed the least positive bias in patients with hypertriglyceridemia.
Materials
Research report data (1).xlsx Troubleshooting