Sep 22, 2022
ADR Assessment of TB Patients IIPHG
- Harsh Shah1,
- Sandul Yasobant1,
- Jay Patel1,
- Priya Bhavsar1,
- Deepak Saxena1,
- Somen Saha1,
- Anish Sinha [ Department of Public Health Science1
- 1Department of Public Health Science, Indian Institute of Public Health, Gandhinagar
Collection Citation: Harsh Shah, Sandul Yasobant, Jay Patel, Priya Bhavsar, Deepak Saxena, Somen Saha, Anish Sinha [ Department of Public Health Science 2022. ADR Assessment of TB Patients IIPHG. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.bp2l69n11lqe/v1
License: This is an open access collection distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Other
We have finalized this protocol and now publishing the manuscript.
Created: September 22, 2022
Last Modified: September 23, 2022
Collection Integer ID: 70372
Keywords: Tuberculosis, TB care cascade, Adverse drug reaction, National TB elimination Program, India, Gujarat, IIPHG, delay in tb care cascade, diverse profile of tb patient, resistant tb patient, tb care cascade, tb patients iiphg tuberculosis, drug resistance tb, tb patient, sensitive tb patient, goals of the tb control program, pediatric tb, various phases of care cascade, tb control program, adrs among patient, times more adrs than drug, sensitive tb, tb, training cascade for health care provider, care cascade, infectious disease, examining treatment plan, severe adr, association between adr experience, treatment compliance, drug susceptibility, risk patient, ensuring treatment compliance, present study, phase of the treatment initiation, treatment plan, main aim of this study, adr experience, treatment initiation
Funders Acknowledgements:
United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
Grant ID: 72038620CA00012
Disclaimer
Data of this study is with the Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Gujarat, India. Researchers who want to access to this confidential data are encouraged to approach Dr Harsh Shah, IIPHG. Email: [email protected] and [email protected].
Abstract
Tuberculosis (TB) is the second leading cause of death due to infectious diseases globally, and delay in TB care cascade is reported as one of the major challenges in achieving the goals of the TB control programs. The main aim of this study was to investigate the delay and responsible factors for the delay in the various phases of care cascade among TB patients in two Indian states, Jharkhand and Gujarat. This cross-sectional study was conducted among the 990 TB patients from the selected TUs of two states. This study adopted a mixed-method approach for the data collection. The study targeted a diverse profile of TB patients, such as drug-sensitive TB (DSTB), drug resistance TB (DRTB), pediatric TB, and extra-pulmonary TB. It included both public and private sector patients. The study's findings suggested that 172 (29%) patients experienced ADRs with at least one symptom. Out of those, 80% had mild symptoms, and 133 (77%) experienced them during the early (intensive) phase of the treatment initiation. The 18 (56%) drug-resistant TB patients on second-line ATTs reported ADR, 50% of whom reported moderate and severe ADRs. The association between ADR experience and drug susceptibility was significant (p value of 0.005; Chi-squared 12.193) and drug-resistant TB patients experience two times more ADRs than drug-sensitive TB patients (odds ratio 2.049, CI: 1.47–2.86). The TB patients had experienced gastric disturbances, skin-related symptoms, peripheral nervous system symptoms, arthralgia, ophthalmic discomfort, and psychological disorders during ATT. The regression model showed that the Nagelkerke R2 value was 0.139 with a classification accuracy of 71%. The present study focused on adverse events pertaining to TB patients missed by the health system. The analysis delivered crucial conclusions that could direct policymakers to educate and train all healthcare professionals and high-risk patients on how to solicit and manage ADRs among patients receiving programmatic treatment effectively. It is crucial to strengthen the program by carefully examining treatment plans based on medical history, ensuring treatment compliance, managing adverse events aggressively and proactively, and establishing a training cascade for health care providers and treatment supporters.
Attachments
Troubleshooting
Data of this study is with the Indian Institute of Public Health Gandhinagar (IIPHG), Gujarat, India. Researchers who want to access to this confidential data are encouraged to approach Dr Harsh Shah, IIPHG. Email: [email protected] and [email protected].
Attachments
Files