Feb 13, 2024
A/Ci method using Dynamic Assimilation Technique
- Mauricio Tejera-Nieves1,
- Luke M. Gregory1,2,
- Aaron Saathoff3,
- Berkley J. Walker1,2
- 1MSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory;
- 2Plant Biology Department, Michigan State University;
- 3Veterinary Medicine Research and Development, Zoetis Inc.
Protocol Citation: Mauricio Tejera-Nieves, Luke M. Gregory, Aaron Saathoff, Berkley J. Walker 2024. A/Ci method using Dynamic Assimilation Technique. protocols.io https://dx.doi.org/10.17504/protocols.io.8epv5xpj4g1b/v1
Manuscript citation:
Mauricio Tejera-Nieves, Do Young Seong, Lucas Reist, Berkley J. Walker*. The Dynamic Assimilation Technique measures photosynthetic CO2 response curves with similar fidelity as steady-state approaches in half the time. Submitted to Journal of Experimental Botany (MS ID#: JEXBOT/2023/311662)
*Corresponding author: [email protected]
License: This is an open access protocol distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited
Protocol status: Working
We use this protocol and it's working
Created: January 12, 2024
Last Modified: February 14, 2024
Protocol Integer ID: 93453
Keywords: Photosynthesis, rubisco carboxylation limitation, gas exchange methods, RuBP regeneration limitation, A/Ci response, Triose phosphate limitation, sink limitation, climate change, dynamic assimilation technique the net co2 assimilation, net co2 assimilation, response to intercellular co2concentration, fundamental measurement in photosynthesis, intercellular co2concentration, plant physiology research, consistent across all co2 protocol, photosynthesis, co2 protocol, using dynamic assimilation technique, arabidopsi, oxygenase carboxylation limitation, estimations of biochemical limitation, arabidopsis thaliana
Funders Acknowledgements:
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Biological and Environmental Research
Grant ID: DE-SC0018409
U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences
Grant ID: DE- FG02-91ER20021
Disclaimer
DISCLAIMER – FOR INFORMATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY; USE AT YOUR OWN RISK
The protocol content here is for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal, medical, clinical, or safety advice, or otherwise; content added to protocols.io is not peer reviewed and may not have undergone a formal approval of any kind. Information presented in this protocol should not substitute for independent professional judgment, advice, diagnosis, or treatment. Any action you take or refrain from taking using or relying upon the information presented here is strictly at your own risk. You agree that neither the Company nor any of the authors, contributors, administrators, or anyone else associated with protocols.io, can be held responsible for your use of the information contained in or linked to this protocol or any of our Sites/Apps and Services.
Abstract
The net CO2 assimilation (A) response to intercellular CO2concentration (Ci) is a fundamental measurement in photosynthesis and plant physiology research. Here, we optimized and compile a non-steady state Dynamic Assimilation Technique (DAT) protocol for A/Ci measurements. We tested this protocol in Tobacco (Nicotina tabacum), arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana; Col-0), soybean (Glycine max ‘AG21XF1’, Asgrow, New Haven, CT, USA), potato (Solanum tuberosum; ‘PA01N32-1’), apple (Malus domestica ‘Jonagold Decoster PP#80’ on ‘EMLA 106’ rootstock) and the extremophile plant Rhyza Stricta, and compare the parameter estimations against conventional steady state A/Ci measurements. The DAT protocol reduced the measurement time by almost half without compromising estimations accuracy or precision. Estimations of biochemical limitations to photosynthesis were very consistent across all CO2 protocols, with slight differences in ribulose 1·5- bisphosphate carboxylase/oxygenase carboxylation limitation.
Materials
The A/Ci measurement method using the dynamic assimilation technique requires a LI-6800 (Li-cor BioSciences, Nebraska, USA) equipped with either the Small Light Source (6800-02) or Multiphase Flash Fluorometer (6800-01A) chamber. In case of using the flash fluorometer chamber, all fluorescence features must be turned off.
Equipment
LI-6800
NAME
Portable Photosynthesis System
TYPE
LI-COR BioSciences
BRAND
LI-6860
SKU
LINK
Equipment
Small Light Source (6800-02)
NAME
LI-6800 chamber head and light source
TYPE
LICOR BIOSCIENCES
BRAND
LI-6850
SKU
LINK
Equipment
Multiphase Flash Fluorometer (6800-01A)
NAME
LI-6800 chamber head, light source and flash fluorometer
TYPE
LI-COR BioSciences
BRAND
6800-01A
SKU
LINK
Troubleshooting
Prepare LI-6800 for measurements
Check instrument chemicals and run warm-up test
Start Up > Warmup Tests > Select Warmup Test from dropdown menu > Start
30m
Prepare LI-6800 for Dynamic measurements
Enable Dynamic Computations: Start Up > Chamber Setup > Check 'Add Dynamic Equations'
Disable Fluorometer functions: Start Up> Chamber Setup > under 'Fluorometer function as' check 'Light Source only'
The dynamic assimilation technique relies on a continuous ramping of the CO2
concentration during the A/Ci measurement. To avoid estimation errors associated with apparent differences in the leaf sample and reference measurement channels, two main steps must be considered. Both must be performed with an empty chamber.
Acquire CO2 and H2O range match.
Constants > Range Match > select 'CO2 Range Match' from dropdown menu > Start > Tap 'Continue' on the pop-up window. Repeat and select 'H2O Range Match'.
If Range Match does not appear in the Constant Tab, double check 'Add Dynamic Equations' under Chamber Setup in the Start Up tab is checked.
Look into Acquiring range match data in the Licor Operating Instructions website for further details.
When acquiring CO2 and H2O range match data, it is crucial for the consistency of the measurements that ramp up values overlap reasonably close with the ramp down values. If not the Flow_s/Flow_r parameter to needs to be adjusted to compensate; Flow_s/Flow_r should be lowered if the "coming back" (Ramp down; ∇ symbols) values are higher than the "going up" (Ramp up; Δ symbols) values, and vice-versa. Usually small changes in the Flow_s/Flow_r parameter lead to larger changes in the trajectory of the ramp up and down values, we suggest using +/- 0.02 increments.
CO2 and H2O range matches should be done at least once before collecting new data for CO2 response curves. If measurements are collected where there are large changes in ambient air temperature, both range matches should be done every 2 - 3 hours, or at least once in the morning and once in the afternoon.
15m
Run CO2 dynamic tuning
Constants > Dynamic > Utilities/Test (bottom right corner of the screen) > Select 'CO2 Test Current' from dropdown menu > Start > Tap 'Continue' on the pop-up window
Upon completion of the test, the user looks for minimum variation in Adyn, and no correlation with ramp direction.
'Before' and 'After' statistical summary appears on screen next to the graph. If the standard deviation of the "After" is lower than the "Before" stats, the user should add this result by tapping the 'Yes' button. Otherwise, the user may tap 'No' and discard this
5m
Clamp onto your first leaf
Set environmental conditions in the leaf chamber to mimic the ambient conditions the leaf was experiencing at the time of measurement. Please follow LICOR Clamping onto your first leaf instructions for a complete description.
Open log file: Log Setup > Open a Log File > Select folder > New File > Type file name > Done
Run Dynamic Assimilation CO2 Response Curve
Once measurements are stable over 2 - 4 minutes, start the Dynamic Assimilation CO2 Response Curve.
Open Dynamic Assimilation Background Program : Programs > BP builder > In the Dynamic folder select 'DAT_CO2_Continuous.py' > Start BP
Set Program Options. When the Background Program is started a dialog box opens with the following options:
- Starting CO2: Initial CO2 concentration of the ramping. We recommend using a Low-to-High protocol to avoid oscillations in assimilation. Suggested value: 50 μmol mol-1
- Pre ramp wait: Length of equilibration period at the initial CO2 concentration before the ramping starts. Suggested value: 3 min
- Ending CO2: Final CO2 concentration of the ramping. Suggested value 1500 - 2000 μmol mol-1
- Ramp rate: Sets the rate at which CO2 changes in the leaf chamber during the program. It affects how long it takes to complete the response curve. Suggested value 100 - 200 μmol mol-1 min-1 (Reduce rate if assimilation oscillates after it has passed the initial linear portion)
- Logging interval: Frequency of data collection during the protocol. Suggested value = 1
- When done, go to: Final CO2 concentration after the protocol has been completed. Suggested value: 420 μmol m-2 s-1
Tap 'Continue' bottom to start the Dynamic Assimilation CO2 Response Curve.
Close log file
Upon completion of last Dynamic Assimilation CO2 Response Curve, close log file:
Log Setup > Logging to Filename > Close Log
Follow LICOR Transferring files to a computer for instructions on how to download data from the instrument.
Additional Notes
Range CO2 and H2O matching:
- The Acquire program has 'Normal' and 'Quick' modes. The 'Quick' mode runs at a faster rate, and tends to exaggerate the difference between ramping up and down values. If the Flow_s/Flow_r parameter is optimized using the 'Quick' mode, the overlap will be even better using the 'Normal' mode.
- The overlap for the "going up" and "coming back" values do not need to be perfect, but they should be reasonably close together. Please refer to Figure 1 for a good overlapping example.
Figure 1: Response of the difference between CO2 concentration measured in the sample and reference channel (y-axis) to increasing (Δ symbols) and decreasing (∇ symbols) CO2 concentrations (x-axis). Users looks for changes in increasing and decreasing concentrations to be as overlapped as possible.
Dynamic Assimilation Background Program considerations:
- Suggested values may vary from plant to plant and in different environments, we recommend running a couple of test runs to optimize the program options.
- The Starting CO2 could be as low as 5 μmol mol-1, avoid 0 μmol mol-1
- Extend Pre ramp wait if assimilation shows a initial decrease after ramping has started
- Use a 1-second averaging window when logging data at 1 Hz as the higher data density helped overcome the additional noise. Log Setup > Logging Options > Check 'Use additional averaging time' > enter '1' on the box to the right
- Logging interval could be increased to 5 (one observation every 5 seconds) if data look noisy. Alternatively, moving averages or filtering could be implemented after the measurement.
- Use ambient or growing CO2 concentration for When done, go to
- Matching options are ignored while running a Dynamic Assimilation CO2 Response Curve.
Steady State:
For reliable data it is crucial the leaf biology is at, or very near, steady-state conditions in the leaf chamber before initiating measurements. Usually leaves have reached steady-state once, over a span of 2 - 4 minutes, net CO2 shows no positive or negative trend and oscillations are within 2 - 5% of the mean.
Environmental Conditions:
Light: If ambient and chamber light levels are not adequately matched, a period of time to allow for light adaption will be needed (especially in cases where light levels are higher in the chamber than preceding ambient conditions).
Water vapor & temperature: In some cases, using a set VPD value could occasionally introduce artifacts during the CO2 ramp. If this is the case, set reference H2O to a level that resulted in 45-50% relative humidity in an empty chamber; leaf transpiration would add enough additional water vapor so that leaf VPD remained fairly stable throughout the DAT curve.